Our Records Find A Home

Our Union's historical records find a home with the University of Washington's Harry Bridges Chair for Labor Studies Archives

SAFETY DRILL.JPG

Capt. Larson (Center) with his crew during a recent safety drill

The Deep Sea Fishermen's Union has been busy with the project of cataloging and archiving its historically significant documents under the oversight of Seattle fishing vessel Captain Dave Larson. Capt. Larson concluded his initial work with the Labor Archives of Washington (LAW)  in April of this year prior to his five month-long series of tuna fishing trips in the South Pacific. Capt. Larson is now back in Home Port Seattle and after some much earned time with his family, he will resume leading the Deep Sea Fishermen's Union archiving project. We could certainly use more hands on this project so please let us know if you can help out.

The Labor Archives was founded in 2010 to preserve the records of working people and their unions and to serve as a center for historical research, ensuring that new generations have access to the rich labor history of the region. The Labor Archives contains more than 300 separate collections of labor and labor-related materials from individuals and organizations documenting the local, national, and international dimensions of the labor movement in the Pacific Northwest.

Collections document the intersection between labor unions and social justice, civil rights, and political organizations that feature a labor relations or labor rights dimension as part of their focus. A unit of the Special Collections of the University of Washington Libraries, the Labor Archives is a collaborative project of the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies and the University of Washington Libraries.

30th Annual Fishermen's Fall Festival

Experience Fishermen's Terminal

DATE: Saturday, September 15, 2018

LOCATION: Seattle’s Fishermen's Terminal 1900 W Nickerson St. Seattle, WA 98119

TIME: 11:00 AM to 6:00 PM

Fishermen's Fall Fest_9-99_4_0.jpg

The Fishermen's Fall Festival is a free all-volunteer run and donation funded event which serves to educate the public about Fishermen’s Terminal and the North Pacific Fishing Fleet.

The festival is free to attend providing the greater Seattle area community an opportunity to celebrate the commercial seafood industry through a variety of events  while at the same time experiencing the unique character of historic Fishermen’s Terminal.  

In addition to providing this unique, fun and educational community event, the festival also raises money for the Seattle Fishermen’s Memorial providing essential services to the fishermen as well as honoring lives lost at sea.


The Union and Fishing Vessel Owners thank the NPFMC for incremental progress made on Bycatch reduction

Progress is being made with the Council as they are now looking at pelagic and non-pelagic trawl separately - but corrective action regarding the tendering observer exemption and the expansion and refinement of a robust observer program for the partial coverage fleets is essential to the sustainability of the fishery...

Please see the copy below of a recent letter to Council calling for action!

June 20, 2018

Mr. Dan Hull, Chairman
North Pacific Fishery Management Council
605 W. 4th Ave., Ste 306
Anchorage, AK 99501-2252

RE: Future Partial Observer Coverage Changes

Dear Chairman Hull:

    We want to thank the Council for the opportunity provided Fishing Vessel Owner’s Association to comment in Kodiak on the partial- coverage observer program under Agenda Item C-1. The Council action to “include an evaluation of observer effects at finer resolution than gear-level strata, so that observer effects in pelagic and non-pelagic trawl can be investigated,” is an appreciated step forward. This resolution should help focus future observer coverage and a better use of limited funds. However, we want to express our disappointment with the Council not following through with the proposed Council correction to the “tendering exemption” and not asking the staff to look at cost associated with getting coverage levels increased to the 30% for the partial- coverage fleets.     

The abuse of the tendering observer exemption, as described on page 105 of the May 2017 Annual Observer Report, describes the outright subversion of the observer program by certain shore-based entities in their efforts to avoid the needed counting of salmon bycatch. We believe vessel operation incentives to avoid coverage are still present for vessels tendering Pacific cod.  We would also inform the Council that the fact the shore-based processors only receive a warning for their manipulation of bycatch accounting has not gone unnoticed by the harvesters.     

The Council’s failure to look seriously at longer-term solutions for increasing observer coverage was disappointing. We believe the following action would provide beneficial information to the Council relative to costs in expanding coverage to partial-coverage vessels. We continue to support a Council discussion paper that would examine a separate program with a “pay as you go” system for pelagic and non-pelagic trawlers while keeping fixed gear operations within the current ADP observer program. We believe random selection can be a design of both formats. One form of the analysis would be the fee necessary to get fixed gear up to 30% of catch or trips and the cost of the trawl fleet to obtain similar coverage of their tows and/or catch.     

In summary, we want to thank the Council for taking a positive step in looking at pelagic and non-pelagic trawl separately. We request that the Council complete its own proposed correction action to the tendering observer exemption, which, as yet, has not been tasked to staff for completion. Lastly, we request the Council examine our request for expanding and developing a more robust observer program for the partial coverage fleets.

Sincerely,

         Robert D. Alverson                                                      James Johnson         Manager                                                                       Executive Director         Fishing Vessel Owners' Association                          Deep Sea Fishermen's Union

        Robert D. Alverson                                                      James Johnson
        Manager                                                                       Executive Director
        Fishing Vessel Owners' Association                          Deep Sea Fishermen's Union


The United States looks abroad to provide seafood to its citizens

The United States looks abroad to provide seafood to its citizens

Federal data say the United States imported more seafood in 2017 than at any point in its history, and the nation's trade deficit in the sector is growing. Some of the seafood items that American consumers are especially fond of, including salmon, tuna and shrimp, are heavily dependent on foreign imports to make it to U.S. markets and restaurants.

"[Expletive] the Fishermen!"

This article is from the Fishermen's News, July 2018 and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Deep Sea Fishermen's Union

By Chris Philips, Managing Editor - Fishermen's News

THIS SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN THE SENTIMENT FOR years among those elected to represent you in the City of Seattle and the State of Washington. Finally, someone has come right out and said it.

              Seattle City Councilman Mike O’Brien and his wife were kicked out of a gala reception for the arts in early May. The private reception was hosted by a local business with ties to commercial fishing, and Councilman O’Brien’s presence, in shirtsleeves and suspenders among the tuxedoes and cocktail dressed, was not welcome. The organizers made it clear that his political positions are in direct contradiction to continued success of Seattle’s commercial fishing industry. Having been asked twice to leave, O’Brien was escorted off the premises, spilling his beer along the way. One her way out the door, O’Brien’s wife, Julie, allegedly turned around and shouted to the hundreds of well-heeled guests, [Expletive} the fishermen!’

              Classy.

              This incident came as no surprise to those in the local fishing and maritime industries. Seattle’s recent institutional antagonism toward the fishing industry is well known. As early as 2004, Mayor Greg Nickels famous for welcoming transients to camp on private property, told the press that the fishing industry in Ballard and Fremont was dirty, and he would rather they moved to Kent, a landlocked city south of Seatac airport.

              His successors, Mayors McGinn and Murray, have also been hostile to the businesses in Ballard and Magnolia that rely on the city for transportation infrastructure.

              The state itself has been working to force local, non-tribal fishermen out since at least the 2012 election of Governor Jay Inslee, who has been an outspoken proponent of reserving the state’s seafood resources for the sport fishermen. The Governor’s latest salvo in his efforts to rid the state of commercials fishermen in his “blue” economy initiative, in which he promotes the distant-water fleets that fish outside of state waters to the detriment of local fishermen, which he promoted at another gala event, this one attended by bureaucrats and captains of industry but no local fishermen.

              The “Maritime Innovation Advisory Council” includes a panel or representatives form several state agencies but carefully avoids including any non-tribal commercial fishermen on the panel. Governor Inslee argues that tribal fisheries can supply all the necessary commercials fish to the state’s consumers. Of the three co-chairs leading the group, one is State Representative Gael Tarleton, who represents the state’s 36t legislative district, which includes Ballard and Fishermen’s Terminal, who recently urged the state to prioritize increased recreational fishing over commercial fishing in State waters.

              A study in 2015 found that those involved in the commercial fishing industry in Seattle earned an average of $70,000 – enough to support a family and pay taxes in a city and state that are working hard to chase them away. Julie O’Brien simply shouted publicly what her husband, the Governor and many state lawmakers have been untroubledly been saying privately for years.


China slams Alaska and US Seafoods with 25% Tariff on $1 Billion in Imports

SEAFOODNEWS.COM  [SeafoodNews] by John Sackton – June 15, 2018

China wasted no time retaliating against President Trump’s trade war. The US seafood industry has been hit hard.

China will impose 25% punitive tariffs on a range of US seafood exports worth nearly $1 billion in 2017.

The tariffs will go into effect on July 6th. They are calculated as 25% additional tax on the imported cost of the product, including any previous tariffs.

So if a dungeness crab product was taxed at 12%, the 25% will be on the total cost, ie import cost plus previous tariff.

Virtually no important US seafood product was left off the list.

The tariffs will hit pink salmon, chum salmon, frozen cod, frozen pollock, all flatfish, sockeye salmon, atka mackerel, herring, sablefish, geoduck etc. etc. A full list of the top 25 species hit by the tariffs is at the end of this story.

In 2017, the seafood exports subject to this tariff were worth $987 million.

Using 2017 figures, the value to Alaska of the products hit by the punitive tariff is more than $750 million.

For the West Coast, Dungeness crab , Hake, Geoduck, coldwater shrimp are all hit.

In Maine, live and frozen lobster are hit as well. This will have an immediate impact on the live lobster market, shifting even more Canadian product to China, and leaving the US at a disadvantage in both the Chinese and European export markets, where Canada already has duty free access.

The ramifications are very serious for Alaska as well. All the Alaska products that go to China for reprocessing, such as pollock, cod, and pink salmon, will be subject to the 25% tariff.

The cost of these tariffs will hit the seafood industry, because ultimately there is little choice but to continue to send these products to China. China has become the de facto export destination for virtually all seafood reprocessing done overseas.

When the US imposed tariffs on Chinese solar panels, the Chinee government stepped in to eat the increased cost. As a result, the Chinese companies selling solar panels are still selling them in the US.

There is little chance of our industry getting the same support. So through absolutely no fault of our own, most companies will see a big hit to their bottom line, because they will have to agree to lower prices in order to maintain marketability in the face of this 25% increase in costs.

Is there a silver lining? The only positive response I can see from this is the potential to process more fish in Alaska. However, most plants there are near capacity, labor issues abound, and many plants in both salmon and groundfish have reconfigured themselves to freeze and export products, not to fillet and do final packaging.

For the lobster industry, I see no positives whatsoever. Lobster prices have already been coming down, and taking away a major US export market will mean the US domestic lobsters are far more restricted than Canadian lobsters.

China is also the main market for specialty seafoods like sablefish and geoduck. Again, these items will face an immediate 25% tax – pushing up their cost in China.

All in all, this represents the worst outcome feared by the industry. The Chinese are deliberately targeting smaller industries that have little ability to fight back, much as other countries hit by US tariffs are targeting specialty items like bourbon or motorcycles.

In the overall picture, soybeans are the big shoe here. China is the primary market for this crop, one of the largest produced by American Farmers. It was also on the list of tariffs announced today, along with pork. 

Go to SEAFOODNEWS.com to read the rest of BREAKING NEWS: China Slams Alaska and US Seafood Industry with 25% Tariff on $1 Billion in Exports


Pacific halibut groups call out NPFMC over 'inability' to reduce bycatch

Pacific halibut groups call out NPFMC over 'inability' to reduce bycatch

"The Scientific and Statistical Committee, the Observer Committee and the Advisory Panel have all pointed out serious data quality problems with how the Council has supervised the Gulf of Alaska Observer program," said Odergaard and Johnson.